What are the main advantages and disadvantages of the ethnocentric polycentric?


When it comes to doing business in a foreign country, there are two main ways to structure your organization: the ethnocentric and the polycentric approach.

The ethnocentric approach is when the headquarters of the company is located in the home country and all other subsidiaries are located abroad.

The polycentric approach is when each subsidiary is autonomous and has its own management team.

In this blog post, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches so that you can decide which one is right for your business!

What are the main advantages and disadvantages of the ethnocentric polycentric?

The ethnocentric approach to staffing is characterized by a high degree of control exercised by headquarters over subsidiaries.

The advantage of this model is that it allows for a high degree of standardization and coordination across the organization.

Additionally, the ethnocentric model provides a way for organizations to transfer knowledge and best practices from one location to another.

However, the ethnocentric approach also has several disadvantages. First, it can lead to a feeling of isolation among employees at subsidiaries, who may feel that they are not trusted to make decisions on their own.

Additionally, the ethnocentric model can be quite costly to implement, as it requires the organization to maintain a large staff at headquarters.

Finally, the ethnocentric approach can limit career mobility for employees, as they may only be able to advance within their home subsidiary.

In contrast, the polycentric staffing approach is characterized by a high degree of autonomy given to subsidiaries.

The main advantage of this model is that it helps to reduce the perception of culture shock among employees who are transferred to foreign locations.

Additionally, the polycentric model is generally more cost-effective than the ethnocentric approach, as it requires fewer personnel at headquarters.

What is an example of polycentric approach?

The polycentric approach to recruitment is an effective way to fill positions with qualified candidates who are familiar with the local area.

This approach can be especially helpful when businesses require the expertise of locals in order to run their operations effectively.

By placing ads in local job boards or partnering with local agencies, businesses can reach a large pool of potential candidates who are likely to be a good fit for the open positions.

Additionally, the polycentric approach can help businesses build relationships with the community and improve their reputation.

By investing in the local workforce, businesses can demonstrate their commitment to the community and create a positive image that attracts customers and other business partners.

What are the main advantages and disadvantages of the polycentric?

The advantages of the polycentric staffing approach include reducing cultural blindness and increasing cost efficiency.

The main disadvantage of this approach is that it limits career mobility for employees and can isolate headquarters from subsidiaries located in foreign countries.

When using the polycentric approach, companies staff their subsidiaries with local citizens who are familiar with the culture and customs.

This can reduce cultural blindness, as well as the costs associated with training employees from headquarters who are unfamiliar with the local culture.

However, the downside of this approach is that it does not allow for career growth or mobility for employees, as they are confined to working in their subsidiary’s country.

Additionally, this method can also lead to headquarters being isolated from its foreign subsidiaries, as communication and understanding between the two may be limited.

What is an advantage of a polycentric staffing approach?

The polycentric staffing approach has a number of advantages that appeal to multinational corporations. One key benefit is that it reduces cultural blindness.

By staffing each subsidiary with employees from the local culture, businesses can avoid the pitfalls of cultural misunderstanding and build strong relationships with their customers and partners.

Additionally, the polycentric model is cost-effective to implement, as it does not require the expensive process of relocating employees from headquarters to foreign subsidiaries.

However, there are also some drawbacks to this approach. One downside is that it restricts the mobility of employees, as they are typically only familiar with the local culture and language.

This can make it difficult for businesses to transfer employees between subsidiaries or dispatch them to new locations.

Additionally, the polycentric staffing approach can isolating headquarters from subsidiaries with foreign locations, making it more difficult for managers to coordinate activities across the company.

Despite these challenges, the polycentric staffing approach remains a popular choice for multinational corporations due to its many benefits.

What are the disadvantages of ethnocentric approach?

There are a few disadvantages to using an ethnocentric approach when staffing international operations. First, this approach can be a challenge in guiding employees who live far away from their parent country.

Second, companies using an ethnocentric approach may not take advantage of the chance to recruit the most skilled personnel from the host country.

Finally, cultural differences between leaders of the host country and employees from the parent company can lead to misunderstandings and conflict.

While ethnocentric approaches have some drawbacks, they also offer benefits such as familiarity and consistency in leadership.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to use an ethnocentric approach depends on the specific needs of the company.

Which companies are using polycentric approach?

The polycentric approach to innovation is becoming increasingly popular among large companies.

Polycentric innovation involves setting up research and development centers in multiple countries in order to tap into global talent pools.

Two of the most notable companies using this approach are John Deere and Cisco. John Deere, the world’s largest manufacturer of agricultural equipment, has set up an R&D center in India.

The company is aiming to develop new products for the growing Indian market, as well as to gain a better understanding of the needs of farmers in other countries.

Cisco, meanwhile, has established an Innovation Center in Bangalore. The center is working on developing new technologies for the Internet of Things, as well as on ways to improve Cisco’s existing products.

By establishing R&D centers in multiple countries, these companies are able to benefit from the best minds in the world and stay at the forefront of innovation.

What is the advantage of polycentric?

The polycentric approach to staffing multinational corporations suggests that each subsidiary should be staffed with employees from the host country.

This has a number of advantages. First, it is usually cheaper to hire locals than to bring in expatriates. Second, local staff tend to have higher morale, since they are not away from home.

Third, since they have a better understanding of the local market, they are likely to be more productive.

Finally, by providing career opportunities for nationals of the host country, the firm can help to improve its image.

In sum, the polycentric approach has a number of advantages that make it attractive to multinational firms.

What is a polycentric staffing approach?

A polycentric staffing approach can be beneficial for multinational corporations because it helps to ensure that the company is familiar with local customs and regulations.

In addition, a polycentric approach can help to foster good relations with the local community. However, there are some drawbacks to this type of staffing.

For example, it can be difficult to find qualified staff members in certain parts of the world, and there may be language barriers.

In addition, a polycentric staffing approach can lead to a feeling of isolation among employees who are not from the host country.

As a result, it is important to carefully consider the pros and cons of this type of staffing before implementing it.

What are staffing approaches?

The four staffing approaches multinational corporations can use are ethnocentric, geocentric, polycentric, and Regio centric.

Ethnocentric staffing is when a company primarily staffs with people from their own country. Geocentric staffing is when a company views the world as one labor market and does not discriminate based on nationality.

Polycentric staffing is when companies staff based on the best talents available in each local labor market.

Regio centric staffing is when staffing decisions are made based on the similarity between the local labor market and the company’s home base.

The most common approach used is polycentric because it leads to the best talent pool. Multinational corporations also have the option to use a combination of all four methods depending on business needs.

This combined method is known as the global hybrid staffing approach and it’s becoming more popular in recent years.

No matter what staffing approach is used, it’s important for companies to maintain a diverse workforce in order to be successful on a global scale.


The advantages and disadvantages of the ethnocentric polycentric approach have been laid out.

The main advantage is that it alleviates cultural myopia, while the main disadvantage is that it limits career mobility.

Other disadvantages include isolation of headquarters from foreign subsidiaries and expense to implement.

Each company must weigh these pros and cons in order to make the best decision for their business.

About the author

Add Comment

By Admin

Your sidebar area is currently empty. Hurry up and add some widgets.